Ross

National Urban League v. Ross

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 19, 20205:20-cv-05799California653 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE, and others, Case No. 20-cv-05799 LHK 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER ON PROCEDURES FOR IN CAMERA PRIVILEGE REVIEW BY v. MAGISTRATE JUDGES 14 WILBUR L. ROSS, JR., and others, 15 Defendants.

18 The presiding judge has referred to the undersigned magistrate judges in camera 19 review of documents that the defendants assert are privileged. District Court Judge Lucy 20 H. Koh’s orders at ECF 119, 128, 132, 140, and 153 set forth this process. The parties 21 have consented to having the Magistrate Judges’ privilege rulings be final and appealable 22 to the Ninth Circuit or the U.S. Supreme Court. ECF 140. 23 This order supplements Judge Koh’s orders on the privilege dispute process. 24 1. By 11:00 p.m. Pacific time on September 19, 2020, plaintiffs must identify no 25 more than 75 documents as “highest priority” for privilege review from among 26 the documents on defendants’ privilege logs. This should be part of their 27 objection filed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.