McAleenan

Doe 1 v. McAleenan

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 20205:18-cv-02349California925 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 JANE DOE 1, et al., Case No. 18-cv-02349-BLF

Plaintiffs,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO

SEAL (1) PORTIONS OF THE

CHAD F. WOLF, et al., COURT’S JUNE 16, 2020 ORDER; AND (2) PORTIONS OF THE Defendants. DECLARATION OF GABRIEL K.

POLING

12 [Re: ECF 364]

14 Before the Court is Defendants’ administrative motion to seal portions of this Court’s June 15 16, 2020 Order, see Order, ECF 357, and portions of the Declaration of Gabriel K. Poling 16 submitted in support of this motion, see ECF 364-6. Plaintiffs oppose some of Defendants’ 17 proposed redactions to the June 16, 2020 Order. See Response, ECF 367. The Court has 18 considered the parties’ briefs and declarations concerning this motion. Accordingly, the Court 19 GRANTS Defendants’ administrative motion.

I. LEGAL STANDARD

22 “Historically, courts have recognized a ‘general right to inspect and copy public records 23 and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.