Sully

Sully v. Brown

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 23, 20203:92-cv-00829California345 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO DIVISION

ANTHONY J. SULLY,

Case No. 92-0829 WHA Petitioner, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR v. RELIEF FROM FINAL JUDGMENT PURSUANT TO FEDERAL RULE OF RON BROOMFIELD, Acting Warden, CIVIL PROCEDURE 60(B)(6) California State Prison at San Quentin,

12 Respondent.

14 Petitioner has filed a pro se Motion For Relief From Final Judgment Pursuant To Fed. R. 15 Civ. P. 60(b)(6) seeking relief from the Order Granting Summary Judgment on claims contained 16 in petitioner’s federal habeas petition, filed on May 20, 2008. Dkt. No. 230. In a reiteration of 17 claims denied on summary judgment, petitioner alleges that conditions of pretrial confinement 18 caused him to be incompetent to stand trial, and that his habeas counsel, Richard Mazer, provided 19 ineffective assistance by failing to properly raise this claim. In 2014, petitioner filed a successive 20 petition in state court based, in part,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.