King
King v. Ameriprise Auto & Home Insurance
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 20203:20-cv-04118California104 words
Trial Court Opinion
facts sufficient to infer that an insurer or agent ““assume[d] a greater duty” to King by way of such a misrepresentation, his complaint cannot support claims of fraud, misrepresentation, or breach of contract or duty. /d. The case is dismissed with leave to amend. An amended complaint is due 21 days from the date of this order. In addition to considering whether he can truly state claims against Ameriprise, King should consider whether he has a legitimate basis for naming the Costco defendants (and, if so, for what claims).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated: September 22, 2020 >
VINCE CHHABRIA
United States District Judge