Tapia
Tapia v. Moughamian
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA OAKLAND DIVISION 6 JANET TAPIA, Case No: 19-cv-06899 SBA 7 Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING THE SEVENTH CAUSE OF ACTION FOR VIOLATION
VS. OF THE ADA AND REMANDING THE
ACTION TO STATE COURT ALICE MOUGHAMIAN, et al., 10 Defendants. 11 Plaintiff Janet Tapia (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, brings the instant action against 13}| several defendants, including Alice Moughamian (“Moughamian’’) and Felicia Houston (“Houston”), erroneously sued as “Felizia Housthong.”! To date, only Moughamian and 15|| Houston have been served and appeared. The operative pleading is Plaintiff's Second 16|| Amended Complaint for Damages (“SAC”). After reviewing the SAC, the Court issued an order directing Plaintiff to show cause why: (1) the unserved Defendants should not be dismissed without prejudice; and (2) her Seventh Cause of Action for Violation of the Americans with…