Goobich

Goobich v. Excelligence Learning Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 18, 20205:19-cv-06771California2,697 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION Case No. 5:19-cv-06771-EJD

JOEL GOOBICH,

Plaintiff, ORDER COMPELLING ARBITRATION V. AND STAYING CASE || EXCELLIGENCE LEARNING Re: Dkt. No.

CORPORATION,

Defendant. 9 I. Introduction 1] On February 18, 2020 Plaintiff Joel Goobich (“Plaintiff”) filed a motion for default || judgment against Defendant Excelligence Learning Corporation (“Defendant”), or in the alternative, to compel arbitration. Dkt. No. 29. On August 28, 2020, the Court issued an order || denying that motion, finding that the California statute on which Plaintiff relied does not apply || retroactively to this case. Dkt. No. 53. In that order, the Court also acknowledged that both a || parties agreed that the underling royalty-related dispute was subject to the valid arbitration clause || in Plaintiff's…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.