Jeloudov

Jeloudov v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 20203:20-cv-02492California524 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

GREGORY JODI JELOUDOV, Case No. 20-cv-02492-VC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

v. DISMISS WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

AND DENYING MOTION FOR

WELLS FARGO BANK N.A, SANCTIONS WITHOUT PREJUDICE

Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 35,

Wells Fargo’s motion to dismiss Jeloudov’s complaint is granted. Considering the judicially noticeable materials relating to Gregory Jeloudov v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. et al., Case No. CGC-15-546027 filed in San Francisco County Superior Court in 2015, including the California Department of Fair Employment and Housing’s 2014 right-to-sue letter, it appears that Jeloudov’s complaint is time-barred.1 California Government Code section 12965(b) provides that a civil action for discrimination under Title VII must be filed within one year of the right-to-sue letter issued by the Department of Fair Employment and Housing. Because receiving the letter and adhering to the time-limits in section 12965(b) are mandatory pre-requisites to bringing a Title VII lawsuit, the complaint must include allegations relating to these pre- requisites to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.