Sheppard

Sheppard v. Staffmark Investment, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 18, 20205:20-cv-05443California2,472 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 TRACEE SHEPPARD, Case No. 20-cv-05443-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER VACATING JANUARY 28,

v. 2021 HEARING ON MOTION TO

REMAND; AND DENYING MOTION

STAFFMARK INVESTMENT, LLC, et al., TO REMAND Defendants. [Re: ECF 8]

12 Plaintiff Tracee Sheppard (“Plaintiff”), on behalf of herself and a proposed class, sued Defendant Staffmark Investment, LLC for alleged wage and hour violations on March 19, 2019. See Ex. A, Compl. ¶¶ 1, 3, ECF 1-1. On June 1, 2020, Plaintiff amended her complaint to add UPS Mail Innovations, Inc. as a Co-Defendant and add a Private Attorneys General Act (“PAGA”) claim. See Ex. A, First Am. Compl. ¶¶ 1, 69–76 (“FAC”), ECF 1-1. Co-Defendant UPS Mail Innovations (“Defendant UPS”) removed the action from the Santa Clara County Superior Court on diversity grounds under 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d) on August 6, 2020. See Not. of Removal, ECF 1. Plaintiff now moves to remand based…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.