Coleman

Coleman v. Pearson

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 24, 20204:20-cv-04762California633 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 WENDELL COLEMAN, Case No. 20-cv-04762-JSW

Plaintiff,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY

v. CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

AND VACATING CASE

CHRISTINA PEARSON, et al., MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Defendants.

12 On July 14, 2020, Plaintiff filed the Complaint in this case and paid the filing fee. The case is scheduled for an initial case management conference on October 16, 2020 at 11:00 a.m. For the reasons set forth in this Order, the Court VACATES the case management conference, and it will reschedule it as necessary after the Court receives and considers Plaintiff’s response to this Order to Show Cause. When Plaintiff filed the Complaint, he did not submit a proposed summons. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(b) (“On or after filing the complaint, the plaintiff may present a summons to the clerk for signature and seal. If the summons is properly completed, the clerk must sign, seal, and issue it to the plaintiff for service on the defendant. A…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.