McAleenan
Doe 1 v. McAleenan
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 JANE DOE 1, et al., Case No. 18-cv-02349-BLF
Plaintiffs,
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’
v. ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO
SEAL PORTIONS OF THE PUBLIC
CHAD F. WOLF, et al., TRANSCRIPT FOR THE MAY 21, 2020
HEARING
Defendants. [Re: ECF 363]
13 Before the Court is Defendants’ administrative motion to seal portions of the public 14 transcript for the May 21, 2020 hearing before this Court. See Mot., ECF 363. Plaintiffs oppose 15 one of Defendants’ proposed redactions. See Opp’n, 372. The Court has considered the parties’ 16 briefs and declarations concerning this motion. Accordingly, the Court GRANTS Defendants’ administrative motion. I. LEGAL STANDARD “Historically, courts have recognized a ‘general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.’” Kamakana v. City and Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Nixon v.…