Cooper

Cooper v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20203:20-cv-02151California1,859 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ELIZABETH COOPER, Case No. 20-cv-02151-EMC

Plaintiff,

ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S

v. MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND

AMENDED COMPLAINT

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Docket No. 35 Defendant.

12 13 Plaintiff Elizabeth Cooper has filed a foreclosure-related suit against Defendant Wells Fargo. Currently pending before the Court is Wells’s motion to dismiss the second amended complaint (“SAC”). Having considered the parties’ briefs and accompanying submissions, as well as the oral argument of counsel, the Court hereby GRANTS the motion to dismiss. I. DISCUSSION A. Legal Standard Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 8(a)(2) requires a complaint to include "a short and plain statement of the claim showing that the pleader is entitled to relief." Fed. R. Civ. P. 8(a)(2). A complaint that fails to meet this standard may be dismissed pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6). See Fed. R. Civ. P.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.