Tawfik

Tawfik v. Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20203:20-cv-02946California653 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 HUSSEIN TAWFIK, et al., Case No. 20-cv-02946-JSC

Plaintiffs, ORDER RE DEFENDANT'S MOTION v. FOR ENTRY OF JUDGMENT

JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et al., Re: Dkt. No. 35 Defendants.

Before the Court is an unopposed motion for entry of final judgment filed by Defendant JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. (“Chase”). (Dkt. No. 35.) On August 26, 2020, this Court granted Chase’s motion to dismiss with prejudice. (Dkt. No. 34.) Because “no claims remain” and “there are no just reasons to delay entry of judgment,” Chase moves for entry final judgment on the dismissed claims pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). (Dkt. No. 35 at 3.) Having considered the parties’ submissions and determined that oral argument is unnecessary, see N.D. Cal. Civ. L.R. 7-1(b), the Court VACATES the October 8, 2020 hearing and GRANTS Chase’s motion for entry of final judgment. Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b) provides for entry of final judgment where…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.