Williams v. Equifax Credit Bureau

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20203:20-cv-04870California2,133 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JACQUELINE WILLIAMS, Case No. 20-cv-04870-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER SCREENING SECOND

v.

AMENDED COMPLAINT AND

EQUIFAX CREDIT BUREAU, et al., DIRECTING SERVICE

Defendants.

13 I. INTRODUCTION After Plaintiff Jacqueline Williams filed her initial complaint against the three credit bureau agencies, the Court found she failed to state a claim on which relief may be granted pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e). Williams also filed an in forma pauperis application, but the Court found certain responses in her application required clarification. Williams filed an amended complaint, addressing the Court’s concerns regarding her in forma pauperis application and original complaint. The Court granted the application but found the amended complaint did not rectify the shortcomings addressed in its previous order. This screening order addresses Williams’ second amended complaint. II. BACKGROUND …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.