Luttrell

Luttrell v. Hart

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 22, 20205:19-cv-07300California6,962 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION

TYLER LUTTRELL,

Case No. 5:19-cv-07300-EJD Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND v. DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS JAMES HART, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 39 Defendants.

Plaintiff Tyler Luttrell brings this action against the County of Santa Cruz (“County”), Sheriff James Hart (“Sheriff Hart”), Victor Moya (“Moya”), Eduardo Mora (“Mora”) (collectively, “Defendants”), and DOES 1-25, alleging constitutional violations and various state law claims. Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) is presently before the Court. For the reasons below, Defendants’ Motion is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. I. BACKGROUND The following facts are derived from Plaintiff’s allegations in the operative First Amended Complaint (“FAC”), Dkt. No. 29,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.