Bailey

Bailey v. Kinder Morgan G.P., Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20203:18-cv-03424California6,145 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 STEVEN M. BAILEY, Case No. 18-cv-03424-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER APPROVING CLASS ACTION

v. SETTLEMENT AND ATTORNEYS’

FEES

KINDER MORGAN G.P., INC., et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 33, 34 Defendants.

12 Before the Court are Plaintiff’s Motion for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement and Motion for Attorney Fees. ECF Nos. 33, 34. The Court finds this matter suitable for disposition without oral argument and VACATES the October 1, 2020 hearing. See Civ. L.R. 7-1(b). Having reviewed the Settlement Agreement, the moving papers and the record, the Court GRANTS both motions. I. BACKGROUND A. Facts The Complaint in this action alleges that Defendants (collectively, “KM”) are a large energy infrastructure company in North America that owns and operates fossil fuel pipelines and terminals. See Compl. ¶¶ 17-18, ECF No. 1-1. This includes approximately 84,000 miles of pipelines and about 180…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.