McGhee

McGhee v. Broomfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 20204:20-cv-05135California3,702 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TIJUE ADOLPHUS MCGHEE, Case No. 20-cv-05135-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER OF PARTIAL SERVICE;

DISMISSING CERTAIN DEFENDANTS

v. WITH LEAVE TO AMEND; DENYING

AS PREMATURE REQUEST TO

RONALD BROOMFIELD, et al., EXCUSE EXHAUSTION

REQUIREMENT; DENYING

Defendants. REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF

COUNSEL

12 Dkt. Nos. 3, 5

14 Plaintiff, an inmate at San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”), has filed a pro se action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that SQSP officials violated his constitutional rights. His complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is now before the Court for review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. He has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in a separate order. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See 28 U.S.C. 23 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.