Ramirez

Ramirez v. Robertson

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 20203:20-cv-02876California882 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 ARTHUR NESTER RAMIREZ, Case No. 20-cv-02876-WHO (PR)

Petitioner,

ORDER DISMISSING PETITION

v. WITH LEAVE TO AMEND

JAMES ROBERTSON, Respondent.

12 INTRODUCTION Petitioner Arthur Nester Ramirez seeks federal habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 from a prison disciplinary decision. Because it is not clear that the decision affected the length of his sentence, the petition is DISMISSED with leave to file an amended petition on or before November 9, 2020. In the amended petition, Ramirez must make clear whether he lost any time credits because of the disciplinary decision or whether the length of his sentence was otherwise directly affected by the decision. If Ramirez fails to file an amended petition by November 9, 2020, or if the petition submitted by that date is inadequate, this federal habeas action will be dismissed. DISCUSSION This Court may entertain a petition for writ of habeas…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.