Spieth

Spieth v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20203:19-cv-02648-SICalifornia6,701 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 KIMBERLEY S., Case No. 19-cv-02648-SI

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF'S v. MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT AND DENYING

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL DEFENDANT'S CROSS-MOTION FOR

SECURITY, SUMMARY JUDGMENT

11 Defendant. Re: Dkt. Nos. 17, 24 12 13 Plaintiff Kimberley S. seeks Social Security benefits under Titles II and XVI for a variety of mental impairments including Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder (“PTSD”), anxiety, and depression.1 Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), plaintiff filed this lawsuit for judicial review of the final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”) denying her benefits claim. Now before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. Dkt. Nos. 17, 24. Having considered the parties’ papers and the administrative record, and for the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment (Dkt. No. 17), DENIES…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.