Hill

Hill v. Tyler

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20204:20-cv-04797California279 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CYMEYON V. HILL,

Case No. 20-cv-04797-YGR (PR) Plaintiff, 8 Vv. ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITHOUT PREJUDICE

M. TYLER, et al.,

10 Defendants. 11 a On July 17, 2020, Plaintiff, a civil detainee, filed the present pro se civil rights complaint

|] under 42 U.S.C. § 1983.

v In an Order dated August 6, 2020, the Court noted that because Plaintiff is a civil detainee, © 15 || then he is not a “prisoner” subject to the provisions of the Prisoner Litigation Reform Act. Dkt. 6 a at 2 (citing Page v. Torrey, 201 F.3d 1136, 1140 (9th Cir. 2000)). Thus, the Court directed

= || Plaintiff to file a non-prisoner application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). The

|| Court informed Plaintiff that his action could not go forward until he paid the filing fee or filed a || completed non-prisoner IFP application. The Court directed the Clerk of the Court to send 20 || Plaintiff a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.