Escalante

Escalante v. San Francisco Community College District, and Board of Trustees

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 25, 20204:18-cv-05562California5,303 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND4

1 Plaintiff Carolyn Escalante, proceeding pro se, filed her initial complaint against 2 Defendants on September 11, 2018, alleging causes of action against each Defendant in their 3 individual and official capacities. Dkt. No. 1. Defendants are associated with either the San 4 Francisco Community College District (“SFCCD Defendants”) or the Service Employees 5 International Union, Local 1021 (“SEIU Defendants”). On January 8, 2019, Plaintiff filed her first 6 amended complaint, adding Maria M. Lampasona, counsel for the SFCCD Defendants, as a 7 Defendant. Dkt. No. 21 (“FAC”). 8 On September 30, 2019, the Court granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss the FAC. Dkt. 9 No. 81 (“MTD Order”). The Court dismissed with prejudice: (1) all federal claims against the 10 District, SFCCD’s Board of Trustees, Defendant Lampasona, and the individual SFCCD 11 Defendants in their official capacities; (2) the Section 1983 claim against the individual SFCCD 12 Defendants in their individual capacities; and (3) the FMLA and Section 1983 claims against the 13 SEIU Defendants. The Court also dismissed the following claims with leave to amend: (1) the 14 FMLA, ADA, and Civil RICO…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.