Saif'ullah

Saif'ullah v. Bloomfield

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20203:20-cv-04109California335 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 KHALIFAH E.D. SAIF'ULLAH, Case No. 20-cv-04109-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER OF REASSIGNMENT TO A

v. DISTRICT JUDGE

RON BLOOMFIELD, et al., Defendants.

13 Plaintiff Khalifah E. D. Saif’ullah, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against various defendants for allegedly inhumane living conditions at San Quentin State Prison where he is currently incarcerated. Dkt. No. 1 at 4–6. Mr. Saif’ullah is suing defendants in their “official and individual capacity” and also claims that defendants are “vicariously liable for the acts and/or omission of its employees and/or agents.” Id. at 2, 6. All named parties, including unserved defendants, must consent to magistrate judge jurisdiction before a magistrate judge may hear and decide a case. See 28 U.S.C. § 636(c)(1); Williams v. King, 875 F.3d 500, 501–04 (9th Cir. 2017) (magistrate judge lacked…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.