Witczak

Witczak v. Lozano

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20204:20-cv-01566California3,451 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DANIEL ROBERT WITCZAK, Case No. 20-cv-01566-HSG Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH LEAVE

TO AMEND; DENYING REQUEST

v. FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL;

DENYING EMERGENCY MOTION

JARED D. LOZANO, et al., FOR HAIR FOLLICLE TOX SCREEN;

DENYING PRELIMINARY

Defendants. INJUNCTION; DENYING REQUEST

FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

12 Re: Dkt. Nos. 3, 4, 15, 19 13 14 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, an inmate at Valley State Prison, filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, complaining of events at prisons where he was previously housed. His complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is now before the Court for review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in a separate order. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A federal court must engage in a preliminary screening of any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.