Witczak
Witczak v. Lozano
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DANIEL ROBERT WITCZAK, Case No. 20-cv-01566-HSG Plaintiff, ORDER OF DISMISSAL WITH LEAVE
TO AMEND; DENYING REQUEST
v. FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL;
DENYING EMERGENCY MOTION
JARED D. LOZANO, et al., FOR HAIR FOLLICLE TOX SCREEN;
DENYING PRELIMINARY
Defendants. INJUNCTION; DENYING REQUEST
FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT
12 Re: Dkt. Nos. 3, 4, 15, 19 13 14 INTRODUCTION Plaintiff, an inmate at Valley State Prison, filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, complaining of events at prisons where he was previously housed. His complaint (Dkt. No. 1) is now before the Court for review under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A. Plaintiff has been granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in a separate order. DISCUSSION A. Standard of Review A federal court must engage in a preliminary screening of any case in which a prisoner seeks redress from a…