Zambrano

Zambrano v. Golding

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20204:19-cv-03332-HSGCalifornia612 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JUAN CARLOS ZAMBRANO, Case No. 19-cv-03332-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING EXTENSION OF

TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION TO

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT MOTION

ERIC GOLDING, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 36 Defendants.

12 Plaintiff, an inmate at Pelican Bay State Prison (“PBSP”), filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging that PBSP correctional officials were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs, in violation of the Eighth Amendment. On August 13, 2020, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. Dkt. No. 34. As required by N.D. Cal. Local Rule 7-2(c), Defendants’ summary judgment motion was accompanied by a proposed order granting their motion. Dkt. No. 35. This proposed order is not an order entered by the Court. Defendants’ summary judgment motion remains under submission with the Court. Plaintiff’s opposition to the summary judgment motion was due September 10, 2020. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.