Panah

Panah v. State of California Dept. of Corrections and Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20205:14-cv-00166California11,746 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

HOOMAN PANAH,

Case No. 14-00166 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO v. DISMISS CLAIMS AS UNTIMELY; DENYING MOTION FOR

STATE OF CALIFORNIA DEPT. OF SANCTIONS; SETTING BRIEFING

SCHEDULE ON REMAINING

CORRECTIONS AND

CLAIMS

REHABILITATION, et al., Defendants. 16 (Docket. Nos. 162, 163) 17 Plaintiff, an inmate on death row at California’s San Quentin State Prison (“SQSP”), filed a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, alleging unconstitutional acts by SQSP correctional officers. Dkt. No. 1. The operative complaint in this action is Plaintiff’s second amended complaint (“SAC”) along with a supplemental complaint. Dkt. Nos. 54, 67. The Court found the SAC and supplemental stated cognizable claims, and ordered the matter served on Defendants. Dkt. No. 69. Defendants Anderson, Chappell, Ebert, Givens, Hamilton,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.