Holestine

Holestine v. Atchley

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 29, 20205:20-cv-06677California834 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ERNEST KELLY HOLESTINE,

Case No. 20-06677 BLF (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR v. TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER M.B. ATCHLEY, et al., 14 Defendants. (Docket No. 3)

17 Plaintiff, a state inmate, filed the instant pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 18 U.S.C. § 1983 against prison staff at Salinas Valley State Prison. Dkt. No. 1. Along with 19 the complaint, Plaintiff filed a motion for a preliminary injunction and temporary 20 restraining order against SVSP Defendants Warden M. B. Atchley and G. Padilla, the 21 Chief Executive Officer, to instruct, educate, supervise and monitor all SVSP staff 22 regarding the proper use of masks in relation to covid-19 disease transmission health and 23 safety prevention protocols. Dkt. No. 3; Dkt. No. 1 at 8. 24 Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 65 sets forth the procedure for issuance of a 25 preliminary injunction or temporary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.