Aronovsky
Aronovsky v. Berryhill
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 ROBERT M. ARONOVSKY, Case No. 19-cv-02356-VKD
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE CROSS-MOTIONS FOR
v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ANDREW M. SAUL, Re: Dkt. Nos. 23, 25 Defendant.
13 Plaintiff Robert Aronovsky appeals a final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”)1 finding that he was ineligible for continued receipt of Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) for a three-year period based on a transfer of resources that the Commissioner determined was made for less than fair market value. The parties have filed cross- motions for summary judgment, and the matter was submitted without oral argument. Upon consideration of the moving and responding papers, the relevant evidence of record, and for the reasons set forth below, Mr. Aronovsky’s motion for summary judgment is denied, and the Commissioner’s cross-motion for summary judgment is granted.3 22 23 24 1 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.…