Aronovsky

Aronovsky v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20205:19-cv-02356California2,385 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 ROBERT M. ARONOVSKY, Case No. 19-cv-02356-VKD

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE CROSS-MOTIONS FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ANDREW M. SAUL, Re: Dkt. Nos. 23, 25 Defendant.

13 Plaintiff Robert Aronovsky appeals a final decision by the Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner”)1 finding that he was ineligible for continued receipt of Supplemental Security Income (“SSI”) for a three-year period based on a transfer of resources that the Commissioner determined was made for less than fair market value. The parties have filed cross- motions for summary judgment, and the matter was submitted without oral argument. Upon consideration of the moving and responding papers, the relevant evidence of record, and for the reasons set forth below, Mr. Aronovsky’s motion for summary judgment is denied, and the Commissioner’s cross-motion for summary judgment is granted.3 22 23 24 1 Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.