Martey

Martey v. Metropolitan Life Insurance Company

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20205:20-cv-01139California178 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 ABRAHAM MARTEY, Case No.5:20-cv-01139-NC Plaintiff, ORDER OF CONDITIONAL

DISMISSAL

V. Re: Dkt. No. 25 METROPOLITAN LIFE INSURANCE

COMPANY,

12 Defendant.

The Court having been notified of the settlement of this action, and it appearing that . . Lo. . 16 || M0 issue remains for the Court’s determination, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT this

action and all claims asserted herein are DISMISSED with prejudice. The Clerk of the

Court is directed to administratively close this case. Any party may move to reopen the 19 || case, provided that such motion is filed within 30 days. All scheduled dates are || VACATED. The Court retains jurisdiction over this case for 30 days. See Kokkonen v. Guardian || Life Ins. Co. of Am., 511 U.S. 375, 381 (1994). IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 Dated: September 30, 2020 hee—~

NATHANAEL M.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.