Denicolo
Denicolo v. Viking Client Services, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 7 RONALD G. DENICOLO, ET AL., CASE NO. 19-cv-00210-YGR
Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION OF DEFENDANT
VIKING FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
vs. Dkt. No. 105 THE HERTZ CORPORATION, ET AL., Defendants.
On January 11, 2019, plaintiff Ronald G. DeNicolo, Jr. filed this putative class action complaint against Viking Client Services, LLC, d/b/a Viking Billing Service (“Viking”) and The Hertz Corporation (“Hertz”). On October 14, 2019, plaintiff Fox was added by an amended Complaint. DeNicolo alleges four claims against Viking: violation of the federal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), 15 U.S.C. sections 1692f and 1692e; violation of the Illinois 18 Vehicle Code (“IVC”), 625 ILCS § 5/6-305.2; declaratory judgment under 28 U.S.C. § 2201. 19 Plaintiff Fox alleges four claims against Viking for: violation of California’s Rosenthal Fair Debt 20 Collection Practices Act (the “Rosenthal Act”), Cal. Code § 17.1800; California’s Unfair 21 Competition Law (“UCL”), Cal. Bus. & Prof.…