Armstead
Armstead v. Saul
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DELMON A., Case No. 19-cv-04599-TSH
Plaintiff,
ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR
v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT
ANDREW SAUL, Re: Dkt. Nos. 18, 19 Defendant.
12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Delmon A. brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of a final decision of Defendant Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, partially denying his claim for disability benefits. Pending before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. ECF Nos. 18 (Pl.’s Mot.), 19 (Def.’s Mot.). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-5, the motions have been submitted without oral argument. Having reviewed the parties’ positions, the Administrative Record (“AR”), and relevant legal authority, the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion, DENIES Defendant’s cross-motion, and REMANDS this case for further proceedings. II. BACKGROUND A. …