Armstead

Armstead v. Saul

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 28, 20203:19-cv-04599California12,314 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DELMON A., Case No. 19-cv-04599-TSH

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE: CROSS-MOTIONS FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT

ANDREW SAUL, Re: Dkt. Nos. 18, 19 Defendant.

12 I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Delmon A. brings this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), seeking judicial review of a final decision of Defendant Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security, partially denying his claim for disability benefits. Pending before the Court are the parties’ cross-motions for summary judgment. ECF Nos. 18 (Pl.’s Mot.), 19 (Def.’s Mot.). Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 16-5, the motions have been submitted without oral argument. Having reviewed the parties’ positions, the Administrative Record (“AR”), and relevant legal authority, the Court hereby GRANTS Plaintiff’s motion, DENIES Defendant’s cross-motion, and REMANDS this case for further proceedings. II. BACKGROUND A. …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.