Domino
Domino v. Kentucky Fried Chicken
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MICHAEL DOMINO, Case No. 19-cv-08449-HSG
Plaintiff, ORDER SCREENING COMPLAINT
AND GRANTING IN PART AND
v. DENYING IN PART MOTION TO FILE
SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT
KENTUCKY FRIED CHICKEN, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 40 Defendants.
Plaintiff Michael Domino filed suit against Defendants Taco Bell and Kentucky Fried Chicken (“KFC”), asserting claims for, inter alia, racial discrimination and assault. Dkt. No. 6-1 (“FAC”). Plaintiff was granted leave to proceed in forma pauperis in a separate order. See Dkt. No. 12. Upon review of the complaint, the Court now determines that Plaintiff fails to state a claim as to several of the federal causes of action asserted. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(b)(ii). The Court therefore DISMISSES the complaint with leave to amend. I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND As relevant to this case, Plaintiff alleges that on September 19, 2019, he entered the KFC and Taco Bell restaurant at 691 Eddy…