Ross

National Urban League v. Ross

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 1, 20205:20-cv-05799California5,690 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

SAN JOSE DIVISION

NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE, et al., Case No. 20-CV-05799-LHK

Plaintiffs, ORDER RE: CLARIFICATION OF

STAY AND PRELIMINARY

v. INJUNCTION

WILBUR L. ROSS, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 279 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiffs National Urban League; League of Women Voters; Black Alliance for Just 18 Immigration; Harris County, Texas; King County, Washington; City of Los Angeles, California; 19 City of Salinas, California; City of San Jose, California; Rodney Ellis; Adrian Garcia; National 20 Association for the Advancement of Colored People; City of Chicago, Illinois; County of Los 21 Angeles, California; Navajo Nation; and Gila River Indian Community (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) 22 sue Defendants Commerce Secretary Wilbur L. Ross, Jr.; the U.S. Department of Commerce; the 23 Director of the U.S. Census Bureau Steven Dillingham, and the U.S. Census Bureau (“Bureau”) 24 (collectively, “Defendants”) for violations of the Enumeration Clause and the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.