Vallarta

Vallarta v. United Airlines, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 2, 20204:19-cv-05895California8,741 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DIANA VALLARTA, et al., Case No. 19-cv-05895-HSG

Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION TO

v. DISMISS

UNITED AIRLINES, INC., Re: Dkt. No. 19 Defendant.

12 Pending before the Court is Defendant United Airlines’ motion to dismiss. Dkt. No. 19. The Court held a hearing on February 12, 2020. See Dkt. No. 48. For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART the motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiffs Diana Vallarta and Lisa Salmons filed this putative class action on September 20, 2019. See Dkt. No. 1 (“Compl.”). Plaintiff Vallarta is a resident of San Jose and a citizen of California, and Plaintiff Salmons is a resident of Stamford, Connecticut. See id. at ¶¶ 3, 4. Plaintiffs allege that Defendant offers optional, third-party travel insurance to its customers for purchase during the online ticketing process. See id. at ¶¶ 1, 14–15. After a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.