Santelices

Santelices v. Apttus Corporation

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 2, 20204:19-cv-07414California2,788 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 JEFFREY SANTELICES, Case No. 19-cv-07414-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

REMAND AND GRANTING MOTIONS

v. TO SEAL

APTTUS CORPORATION, et al., Re: Dkt. Nos. 20, 24, 29, 35 Defendants.

12 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Jeffrey Santelices’ motion to remand, as well as several administrative motions to seal. See Dkt. Nos. 20, 24, 29, 35. The Court finds this matter appropriate for disposition without oral argument and the matter is deemed submitted. See Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons detailed below, the Court GRANTS the motion to remand. The Court further GRANTS the administrative motions to seal. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff originally filed this action in San Mateo Superior Court on February 8, 2019, against his former employer, Defendant Apttus Corporation. See Dkt. No. 1-1, Ex. 1 at 7.1 Plaintiff alleged that Apttus failed to pay him his severance benefits as well as the value of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.