In re Ripple Labs Inc. Litigation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
VLADI ZAKINOV, et al., Case No. 18-cv-06753-PJH Plaintiffs,
v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND
DENYING IN PART MOTION TO
RIPPLE LABS, INC., et al., DISMISS CONSOLIDATED FIRST
AMENDED COMPLAINT
Defendants. Re: Dkt. No. 102, 103, 109
Before the court is Defendant Ripple Labs, Inc.’s (“Ripple”), defendant XRP II, LLC’s (“XRP II”), and Ripple’s Chief Executive Officer, Bradley Garlinghouse (“Garlinghouse”) (collectively, “defendants”) motion to dismiss plaintiff Bradley Sostack’s (“plaintiff”) consolidated first amended complaint. Dkt. 102. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their argument and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court hereby GRANTS in part and DENIES in part defendants’ motion to dismiss. BACKGROUND This order addresses defendants’ second motion to dismiss in a consolidated putative class action (“In re Ripple”) that arises out of the…