Berryhill

Pinkney v. Berryhill

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20203:18-cv-07140California9,703 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 A.P., Case No. 18-cv-07140-JCS

Plaintiff,

ORDER REGARDING MOTION FOR

v. SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND

MOTION TO REMAND

ANDREW SAUL, Re: Dkt. Nos. 23, 28 Defendant.

I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff A.P.1 moves for summary judgment on his claim that Defendant Andrew Saul, Commissioner of Social Security (the “Commissioner”) erred in denying A.P.’s application for disability benefits. A.P. seeks an order instructing the Commissioner to award benefits under the Ninth Circuit’s credit-as-true doctrine. The Commissioner concedes that the administrative law judge (“ALJ”) who denied A.P.’s application erred, but moves to remand the case for further administrative proceedings. For the reasons discussed below, A.P.’s motion is GRANTED, the Commissioner’s motion is DENIED, and the case is REMANDED for calculation and award of benefits.2 II. BACKGROUND A. A.P.’s Medical History A.P. grew up in foster care and suffered…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.