Johnson v. Monterey & Rancho Plaza

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 5, 20205:18-cv-05718California8,819 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 SCOTT JOHNSON, Case No. 18-cv-05718-BLF

Plaintiff,

ORDER VACATING FEBRUARY 4,

v. 2021 HEARING ON MOTION FOR

DEFAULT JUDGMENT; AND

MONTEREY & RANCHO PLAZA, et al., GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT

Defendants. [Re: ECF 42] 12 Plaintiff Scott Johnson brings this action against Monterey & Rancho Plaza and Tony Dimaggio’s Stromboli & Pizza, Inc. (together, “Defendants”), alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12101, et seq., and the California Unruh Civil Rights Act (the “Unruh Act”), Cal. Civ. Code §§ 51–53. See Compl. ¶¶ 54–83, ECF 1. Mr. Johnson seeks injunctive relief along with statutory damages, attorneys’ fees, and costs. Defendants answered the Complaint on October 23, 2018. See Answer, ECF 11. Defendants and Mr. Johnson also jointly stipulated to extend the site inspection deadline on February 19, 2019…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.