Cox

Cox v. Kia Motors America, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 30, 20205:20-cv-02380California3,298 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 STEPHEN COX and BONNIE COX, Case No. 20-cv-02380-BLF Plaintiffs, 9 v. ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO REMAND

KIA MOTORS AMERICA, INC.,

[Re: ECF 13] Defendants.

13 Before the Court is a motion to remand filed by Plaintiffs Stephen and Bonnie Cox (“the Coxes”). The Court previously vacated the hearing on the motion. See Order Vacating Hearing, ECF 19. The Court has considered the Coxes’ motion, the opposition filed by Defendant Kia Motors America, Inc. (“Kia”), and the Coxes’ reply. For the reasons discussed below, the motion to remand is GRANTED. I. BACKGROUND This action arises from the Coxes’ purchase of a 2014 Kia Soul vehicle in December 2013. See SAC ¶ 10, ECF 1-4. The vehicle allegedly contained or developed numerous defects within the warranty period. See SAC ¶ 12. The Coxes claim that they took the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.