Vincent

Vincent v. San Francisco Sheriff's Office

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 5, 20201:19-cv-00329-RMICalifornia5,669 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA EUREKA DIVISION 7 CAMERON OMARI VINCENT, Case No. 19-cv-00329-RMI

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTION

v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

JONATHAN REYES, et al., Re: Dkt. No. 45 Defendants.

13 Now pending before the court is a motion for summary judgment (dkt. 45) on Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint (dkt. 27) filed by Defendants the City and County of San Francisco, and San Francisco Sheriff’s Deputies Jonathan Reyes and Kyle Tauscher. The court finds this matter to be suitable for disposition without oral argument under Civ. Local R. 7-1(b). For the reasons stated below, Defendants’ motion is granted in part and denied in part. FACTUAL BACKGROUND On October 10, 2018, Plaintiff was a detainee in Defendants’ custody while awaiting trial on certain charges. See Second Amend. Compl. (“SAC”) (dkt. 27) at 3. On that day, he was scheduled to be transported by Defendants…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.