Miguel

Miguel v. Salesforce.com, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 5, 20203:20-cv-01753California4,560 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 TIM DAVIS, et al., individually and on Case No. 20-cv-01753-MMC behalf of all others similarly situated, 8 Plaintiffs, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS v. 10 SALESFORCE.COM, INC., et al., 11 Defendants. 12 Before the Court is the “Motion to Dismiss and to Strike Jury Demand,” filed June 15, 2020, by defendants Salesforce.com, Inc. (“Salesforce”), Board of Directors of Salesforce.com, Inc. (“Board”), Marc Benioff (“Benioff”), The Investment Advisory Committee (“Committee”), Joseph Allanson (“Allanson”), Stan Dunlap (“Dunlap”), and Joachim Wettermark (“Wettermark”). Plaintiffs have filed opposition, to which defendants have replied. Having considered the papers filed in support of and in opposition to the motion, the Court rules as follows.1 BACKGROUND Plaintiffs are former Salesforce employees that participated in the Salesforce 401(k) Plan (“the Plan”). (See Compl. ¶¶ 15-17.) In 2000, the Plan was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.