Adams

Adams v. Manglicmot

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 5, 20204:19-cv-07952California842 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 HERRON A. ADAMS, Case No. 19-cv-07952-HSG

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING SECOND

EXTENSION OF TIME TO FILE

v. DISPOSITIVE MOTION; DENYING

REQUEST FOR APPOINTMENT OF

LINA MANGLICMOT, et al., COUNSEL Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 19,

12 Plaintiff, an inmate at California Training Facility (“CTF”), filed this pro se civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Now pending before the Court is plaintiff’s request for appointment of counsel (Dkt. No. 19), and defendants’ second request for an extension of time to file their dispositive motion (Dkt. No. 20). For the reasons set forth below, the Court DENIES plaintiff’s request for appointment of counsel (Dkt. No. 19), and GRANTS defendants a second extension of time to file their dispositive motion (Dkt. No. 20). DISCUSSION I. Request for Appointment of Counsel Plaintiff has requested that the Court appoint him…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.