Fosselman

Fosselman v. Jackson

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 6, 20203:19-cv-06118California633 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JEROME FOSSELMAN,

Case No. 19-cv-06118-RS (PR) Plaintiff, ORDER REOPENING ACTION; v. ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF

K. JACKSON, et al., TO SERVE UNSERVED

DEFENDANTS Defendants.

12 This action was stayed at plaintiff’s request because he was in medical quarantine and could not participate in litigation while he was so housed. (Dkt. No. 25.) He has been released from quarantine and has filed a motion to reopen. (Dkt. No. 26.) The motion is GRANTED. The action is REOPENED. The Clerk shall modify the docket to reflect this. Two defendants remain unserved, the summonses having been returned unexecuted as to D. Huynh and Stanson. (Dkt. Nos. 21 and 22.) On or before December 1, 2020, plaintiff must either himself serve these defendants with the summons and complaint, or provide the Court with an accurate current location such that the Marshal is able to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.