Demille

Demille v. Jenkins

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 7, 20205:20-cv-04559California1,328 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JULIE ANN DEMILLE, Case No. 20-04559 EJD (PR) 11 Petitioner,

ORDER OF DISMISSAL; DENYING v. MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL AS MOOT

W. Z. JENKINS, II, Respondent. (Docket No. 2)

17 Petitioner, a federal prisoner at the Federal Correctional Institution (“FCI”) in Dublin, filed a pro se petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. Dkt. No. 1. Petitioner paid the filing fee. Id. Petitioner later filed a motion for appointment of counsel. Dkt. No. 2. For the reasons discussed below, this matter must be dismissed. 23 BACKGROUND According to the petition, Petitioner was sentenced in the District of Oregon on March 26, 2019, to 48 months in federal prison. Dkt. No. 1 at 1, 10. On April 30, 2020, she filed a “motion for emergency compassionate release” under 18 U.S.C. § 3582 in that district based on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.