Bees a?

DISTRICT COURT

DISTRICT ARKANSAS

Sep 14, 2020 UNITED STATES JUDICIAL PANEL on

MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

By: Jake Kornegay D.C.

DEP CLERK

IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY

LITIGATION MDL No. 2741

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO —233)

On October 3, 2016, the Panel transferred 19 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the Northern District of California for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407. See 214 F.Supp.3d 1346 (J.P.M.L. 2016). Since that time, 3,030 additional action(s) have been transferred to the Northern District of California. With the consent of that court, all such actions have been assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria. It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are common to the actions previously transferred to the Northern District of California and assigned to Judge Chhabria. Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the Northern District of California for the reasons stated in the order of October 3, 2016, and, with the consent of that court, assigned to the Honorable Vince Chhabria. This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States District Court for the Northern District of California. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the Panel within this 7-day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

Inasmuch as no objection is FOR THE PANEL: pending at this time, the stay is lifted. if = Sep 14, 2020 ( OrOMED STATES I hereby certify that the annexed John W. Nichols MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION i strument is a true and correct copy Clerk of the Panel of the original on file in my office.

ATTEST:

SUSAN Y. SOONG

Clerk, U.S. District Court Northern District of California

Date: 9/f475020

IN RE: ROUNDUP PRODUCTS LIABILITY

LITIGATION MDL No. 2741

SCHEDULE CTO−233 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS

DIST DIV. C.A.NO. CASE CAPTION

ARIZONA

AZ 4 20−00325 Silvas v. Monsanto Company

ARKANSAS EASTERN

ARE 3 20−00260 Imboden et al v. Monsanto Company Corporation

ARKANSAS WESTERN

ARW 1 20−01044 Reaves v. Monsanto Company et al

CONNECTICUT

CT 3 20−01240 Donaghy v. Monsanto Company

FLORIDA SOUTHERN

FLS 9 20−81358 Tejera v. Monsanto Company

LOUISIANA EASTERN

LAE 2 20−02395 Clark v. Monsanto Company

NEW YORK EASTERN

NYE 2 20−02712 Grillo v. Monsanto Company et. al. NYE 2 20−03662 Menarchem v. Monsanto Company

NEW YORK SOUTHERN

NYS 1 20−06638 Richards v. Monsanto Company NYS 1 20−06642 Smith et al v. Monsanto Company

OHIO SOUTHERN

PAE 2 20−04038 BOWEN v. MONSANTO COMPANY

WASHINGTON WESTERN

WAW 3 20−05864 Kooi v. Monsanto Company