In re Apple iPhone Antitrust Litigation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 IN RE APPLE iPHONE ANTITRUST Case No. 11-cv-06714-YGR (TSH)
LITIGATION.
DISCOVERY ORDER
9 Re: Dkt. No. 218
DONALD R. CAMERON, et. al., Case No. 19-cv-03074-YGR (TSH) Plaintiffs, Re: Dkt. No. 101 v.
APPLE INC., Defendant.
17 I. INTRODUCTION Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion to Compel Discovery from Non-Party Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (“Samsung”). ECF No. 218/101. Having considered each side’s position, relevant legal authority, and the record in this case, the Court GRANTS IN PART and DENIES IN PART Apple’s motion to compel. II. BACKGROUND This dispute stems from two antitrust lawsuits pending in this District, one from a putative class of iPhone users and another from a putative class of software developers, both alleging that Apple has monopolized distribution of software applications, or “apps,” on its iOS operating system by requiring that all apps on…