Dixon

Dixon v. Cushman & Wakefield Western, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 9, 20203:18-cv-05813California2,022 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 DIMITRI DIXON, Case No. 18-cv-05813-JSC

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION TO AMEND THE COURT’S

SCHEDULING ORDER AND FOR

CUSHMAN & WAKEFIELD WESTERN, LEAVE TO AMEND

INC.,

Re: Dkt. No. 59 Defendant.

12 In this wage and hour lawsuit, Dimitri Dixon (“Plaintiff”) alleges that Cushman & Wakefield Western, Inc. (“Defendant”) unlawfully denied appraiser and senior appraiser employees guaranteed wage and overtime compensation due to their misclassification as exempt employees. Now pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for amendment of the Court’s 16 scheduling order and leave to file a second amended complaint. (Dkt. No. 59.) After carefully 17 considering the Parties’ motions and having heard oral argument on October 7, 2020, the Court 18 DENIES Plaintiff’s motion.

FACTUAL BACKGROUND

20 Plaintiff was employed by Defendant as an appraiser from 2007 to 2018. (Dkt. No. 37, 21 First Amended Complaint…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.