Hernandez

Hernandez v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 12, 20203:18-cv-07354California5,120 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

ALICIA HERNANDEZ, EMMA WHITE,

KEITH LINDNER, TROY FRYE,

No. C 18-07354 WHA

COSZETTA TEAGUE, IESHA BROWN,

JOHN and YVONNE DEMARTINO, ROSE

WILSON, TIFFANIE HOOD, GEORGE

and CYNDI FLOYD, DEBORA GRANJA, ORDER RE MOTION FOR FINAL and DIANA TREVINO, individually and on APPROVAL OF CLASS behalf of all others similarly situated, SETTLEMENT AND MOTION FOR

ATTORNEY’S FEES AND

Plaintiffs, EXPENSES

v.

WELLS FARGO BANK, N.A., Defendant.

19 INTRODUCTION In this class action certified under Rule 23(b)(3), plaintiffs move for final approval of a settlement agreement and for attorney’s fees and costs. Defendant does not oppose. For the following reasons, both motions are GRANTED. STATEMENT The background of this action has been set forth in prior orders and need not be discussed in detail herein (see Dkt. Nos. 87, 217). In brief, plaintiffs had their…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.