Aleisa
Aleisa v. Square, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 MISHARI ALEISA, et al., Case No. 20-cv-00806-EMC
Plaintiffs,
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S
v. MOTION TO DISMISS AND
GRANTING DEFENDANT’S MOTION
SQUARE, INC., A DELAWARE TO STAY
CORPORATION,
Docket Nos. 33, 42 Defendant. 12 13 Plaintiffs Mishari Aleisa and Nicole Belluomini filed a putative class action against Defendant Square, Inc. (“Square”) asserting claims for violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA” or the “Act”), 47 U.S.C. §§ 201–231. See Docket No. 1 (“Compl.”). Plaintiffs allege that Square texted them without their authorization in violation of the Act. See id. Pending before the Court are Square’s (1) amended motion to dismiss Belluomini’s claims for lack of Article III standing under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(1);1 and (2) motion to stay pending the Supreme Court’s decision in Facebook, Inc. v. Duguid (Duguid II), No. 19-511 (U.S. filed Oct. 17, 2019). See…