Krypt, Inc. v. RoPaar LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 14, 20205:19-cv-03226California1,438 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 7 KRYPT, INC., Case No. 19-cv-03226-BLF (VKD)

Plaintiff,

ORDER RE DISCOVERY DISPUTE

v. RE KRYPT’S REQUESTS FOR

PRODUCTION OF DOCUMENTS

ROPAAR LLC, et al., NOS. 24-25 AND INTERROGATORIES

NOS. 1-

Defendants. 12 Re: Dkt. No. 69 13 Plaintiff Krypt, Inc. (“Krypt”) seeks an order compelling defendant Ropaar, LLC (“Ropaar”) to identify each person Ropaar has employed or offered to employ from January 1, 2012 to the present. Dkt. No. 69. Ropaar argues that this information is not relevant to any claim or defense. Id. The Court has considered the parties’ joint discovery dispute letter and has received two additional exhibits Ropaar asked for leave to submit. The Court finds this dispute suitable for resolution without oral argument. Civil L.R. 7-1(b). For the reasons set forth below, the Court concludes that the discovery Krypt seeks is not relevant to any claim or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.