Scholl

Scholl v. Mnuchin

Good Law
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaOctober 14, 20204:20-cv-05309California14,278 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 COLIN SCHOLL, et al., Case No. 20-cv-05309-PJH Plaintiffs, v. ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND

DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR

STEVEN MNUCHIN, et al., SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND

DENYING MOTION FOR STAY

Defendants. Re: Dkt. Nos. 54, 58 12 13 Before the court are defendants Steven Mnuchin, Charles Rettig, the U.S. Department of the Treasury, the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”), and the United States of America’s (collectively “defendants”) motion for stay of preliminary injunction pending appeal (Dkt. 58, “Mtn.”) and plaintiffs Colin Scholl and Lisa Strawn’s (“plaintiffs”) motion for summary judgment, (Dkt. 54, “MSJ”). The matters are fully briefed and suitable for resolution without oral argument. Having read the parties’ papers and carefully considered their arguments and the relevant legal authority, and good cause appearing, the court rules as follows. BACKGROUND On August 1, 2020, plaintiffs filed a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.