Martifer-Silverado Fund I, LLC v. Zhongli Science and Technology Group Co., Ltd
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 MARTIFER-SILVERADO FUND I, LLC, CASE NO. 19-cv-04243-YGR
Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR LEAVE TO
vs. FILE MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
ZHONGLI SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY Re: Dkt. No.
GROUP CO., LTD., ET AL.,
10 Defendants. 11 The Court is in receipt of defendants Zhongli Science and Technology Group Co., Ltd. and Suzhou Talesun Solar Technology Co., Ltd.’s motion for leave to file a motion for reconsideration of the Court’s September 11, 2020 order denying defendants’ motion to dismiss the first amended complaint (Dkt. No. 45). Having carefully considered the motion, the Court finds that defendants have not satisfied the requirements of Local Rule 7-9(b)(1)-(3). Defendants’ assertion that the Court improperly applied the “purposeful availment” test, instead of the “purposeful direction” test, misconstrues the order. Therein, the Court referred to both tests, and moreover, its analysis focused almost entirely on evidence of defendants’ actions …